|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|
||||||
Obscurantism: What tea are you really buying?
Letter from a Nepali tea producerA few weeks ago a producer from Nepal wrote to me:
What is an oolong?My dear friend from the Himalayas produces a few semi-oxidised teas from the same tea bushes that they yield their black teas with. And with nearly the same processing procedures. Like so many others who follow the "definition" that an oolong is a tea that is between a green and a black tea, it was only natural for him to label the tea "oolong", though it is not. <read more about the difference between a semi-oxidized tea and an oolong>
His tea is not any lesser tea than the finest Darjeeling. Darjeeling is itself famous for partial oxidation. It has, however, never been marketed as an oolong. You can find it under the black tea category in all teashops. Oolong production involved a few particular steps that are totally different from the production of such semi-oxidised black teas. Oolongs are therefore biochemically quite different as an individual category. <read about the production of oolong> Not all people of the tea trade are as willing as Lochan in correcting themselves when they begin to understand the real nature of oolongs. Others propagate the myth. Some knowingly, the majority simply parrot.This is not the only myth in the world of tea anyway. Spreading of myths, to some people in the trade, is seen as conducive to their business benefits. Tea is by far a most humble category in this practice. Seeing the extent what the beauty and slimming industries can do, or financial institutes or even the government, there really is no reason that we blame our fellow tradespeople for their slight twist of facts. To the consumers, however, there is every bit of rights to know what is real. To me as both a trader and an advocate, I think it is only healthy to the trade of tea in the long run to define clearly the nature of things and keep product information as open as possible. It is only through the faith of the mass that the category of tea as a whole can prosper against the massive marketing attacks of junk drinks. It is only through mutual respect, genuine information and open communication that a category can win the faith of the mass.
|
|||||||
Site map | Terms of use | Advertising | Tea Business Directory | "Dialogues" | FAQ | Contact TeaGuardian.com (Tea Guardian) is a self-financed, independent reference guide created with the initiative to promote the better understanding of tea, the daily beverage that so many have come to misunderstand. By sharing with the readers unbiased and in-depth information, we aim at empowering them with the ability to find and enjoy better quality tea for taste and for health. A lot of the information included can be helpful to people of the tea trade and the academics. While we gladly receive any forms of support, including advertisements and other sponsorships, no such actions will in anyway affect our editorial direction or its independence. This website is designed for smooth, non-obstructive reading. It is therefore recommended that it be viewed using modern browsers such as Opera, FireFox, Chrome or Safari. If you need to use IE, please update it to the latest version. All writings about health are interpretation of personal experiences and readings. They reflect the understanding of the related topics by the respective writer and do not constitute any professional medical advise. For details, please refer to the Terms of Use page in the "about" button of the vertical menu bar. Copyrights © 2010~2013 Leo Kwan. All text, photos, designs, drawings, voice and video recordings in this site, unless otherwise stated, are created by Leo Kwan, who holds all related intellectual property rights. For citation, quotation or other usage please refer to the Terms of Use page. |
|||||||